TOTAL : 465, PAGE : 4 / 31, CONNECT : 0 ·Î±×ÀÎ
   Woojin Jung
   [re] To the Group members about the issue of Number 1
That' a good idea.
SungTae's big picture on presentation of "Mutual Socail Relationship" is helpful.
Like Sukmin, I also think that  section 2 (Why does he try to define Rights on Constutional Law) and section  3  (Isn't it possible to define the Rights by interpreting just the article of Constutional Law itself or by some Rule from common law?) is too broad to present about "Mutual Social Relationship".
As the introduction of presentation, I think Who is Max Weber is okay.
How about the other member's opinion?

Actually  now I read about the book relating to "Socail Contract" and prepare to write. During the reading, John Rawls who is famous for Justice study came to me. He also, I think, related with social contract. Is that right?

Who want to research mainly on the section 2 (Between the parties: also includes meaning of mutual and social)?

1. Who is Max Weber?  - 1
2. Between the parties  - 3 or 2
3. On Social Contract   - 2 or 3

Anyone who has a better idea  please write your opinion and let the other teammate share with idea.


    
PREV   proposal for better presentation Kyungyoon Kim
NEXT   Notice to Group1 members [1] Sukmin Kim



     To the Group members about the issue of Number 1   Sungtae Oh    2004/09/03  8565
       [re] To the Group members about the issue of Number 1   Woojin Jung    2004/09/03  7047
         [re] To the Group members about the issue of Number 1   Sukmin Kim    2004/09/04  7047
         [re] To the Group members about the issue of Number 1   Woojin Jung    2004/09/04  6999
Copyright 1999-2025 Zeroboard / skin by ZERO